minnesota: be better than wisconsin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents north america
Weight: 0.59
, city
Weight: 0.58
, colorado
Weight: 0.58
, new orleans
Weight: 0.57
Siblings lutefisk
Weight: 0.39
, latin america
Weight: 0.36
, south america
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than wisconsin 1.00
be more liberal than wisconsin 0.90
be called minnesota 0.80
outperform wisconsin 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(minnesota, be better than wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(minnesota, be better than wisconsin)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(minnesota, be better than wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(minnesota, be more liberal than wisconsin)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(minnesota, be better than wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(minnesota, outperform wisconsin)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(minnesota, be better than wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(minnesota, be called minnesota)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(minnesota, be better than wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(minnesota, be called minnesota)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(minnesota, be better than wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(minnesota, outperform wisconsin)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(minnesota, be better than wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(minnesota, outperform wisconsin)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(minnesota, be better than wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(minnesota, outperform wisconsin)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(minnesota, be better than wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(minnesota, be called minnesota)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(minnesota, be better than wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(minnesota, be more liberal than wisconsin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(minnesota, be better than wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(minnesota, be called minnesota)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(minnesota, be better than wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(minnesota, be more liberal than wisconsin)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(minnesota, be better than wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(minnesota, be more liberal than wisconsin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(minnesota, be better than wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(minnesota, be better than wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(minnesota, be better than wisconsin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(minnesota, be better than wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(minnesota, be better than wisconsin)