mirage: has quality effect

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, aircraft
Weight: 0.47
, car
Weight: 0.46
, set
Weight: 0.46
Siblings chimera
Weight: 0.32
, dark matter
Weight: 0.32
, miracle
Weight: 0.32
, dim sum
Weight: 0.32
, nirvana
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality effect 1.00
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mirage, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mirage, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(miracle, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mirage, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mirage, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(nirvana, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(nirvana, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mirage, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(miracle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(miracle, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mirage, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(dim sum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(dim sum, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mirage, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(mirage, has quality effect)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(mirage, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mirage, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(mirage, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(mirage, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mirage, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mirage, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(mirage, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mirage, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(mirage, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mirage, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mirage, has quality effect)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mirage, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mirage, has quality effect)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mirage, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nirvana, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mirage, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(miracle, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mirage, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dim sum, has quality good)