mirror: display video without glasses

Related concepts

Parents	lens Weight: 0.65 , piece Weight: 0.61 , image Weight: 0.61 , surface Weight: 0.60 , accessory Weight: 0.60
Siblings	camera lens Weight: 0.35 , contact lens Weight: 0.35 , picture frame Weight: 0.34 , prism Weight: 0.34 , magnifying glass Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
display video without glasses	1.00
be blurry without glasses	0.88
be for glasses	0.87
be used in glasses	0.87
be put in glasses	0.86
is glasses	0.86
glasses	0.85
be needed in glasses	0.85
be for glasses expensive	0.85
is expensive glasses	0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(lens, be for glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(mirror, display video without glasses)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(lens, is glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(mirror, display video without glasses)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(lens, is glasses)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(lens, be for glasses)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(lens, be for glasses)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(lens, is glasses)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(prism, be put in glasses)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(prism, be used in glasses)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(prism, be needed in glasses)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(prism, glasses)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(lens, be for glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(mirror, display video without glasses)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(lens, is glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(mirror, display video without glasses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(prism, be used in glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(prism, be used in glasses)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(prism, glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(prism, glasses)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(prism, be put in glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(prism, be put in glasses)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(prism, be needed in glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(prism, be needed in glasses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(mirror, display video without glasses)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(mirror, be blurry without glasses)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(mirror, be blurry without glasses)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(mirror, be blurry without glasses)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(mirror, be blurry without glasses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(mirror, display video without glasses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(mirror, display video without glasses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(lens, is glasses)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(lens, be for glasses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(prism, be used in glasses)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(prism, glasses)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(prism, be put in glasses)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(prism, be needed in glasses)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(lens, is glasses)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(mirror, display video without glasses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(lens, be for glasses)