mississippi: was burning landmark case

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.62
, alabama
Weight: 0.60
, louisiana
Weight: 0.58
, river
Weight: 0.58
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.57
Siblings georgia
Weight: 0.35
, south carolina
Weight: 0.35
, north carolina
Weight: 0.35
, north dakota
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was burning landmark case 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(mississippi, was burning landmark case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(mississippi, was burning landmark case)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(mississippi, was burning landmark case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, was burning landmark case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, was burning landmark case)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(mississippi, was burning landmark case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, was burning landmark case)