missouri: was named

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents iowa
Weight: 0.62
, school
Weight: 0.61
, program
Weight: 0.60
, area
Weight: 0.58
Siblings kansas
Weight: 0.57
, tennessee
Weight: 0.36
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, kentucky
Weight: 0.35
, indiana
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was named 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(missouri, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, was named)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(missouri, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tennessee, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(tennessee, was named)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(missouri, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(missouri, was named)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(missouri, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(missouri, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(missouri, was named)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(missouri, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(missouri, was named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(missouri, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(tennessee, was named)