mitral valve: is thrombogenic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heart valve
Weight: 0.80
, valve
Weight: 0.63
, structure
Weight: 0.52
, heart
Weight: 0.50
, condition
Weight: 0.49
Siblings artificial heart
Weight: 0.35
, faucet
Weight: 0.34
, ventricular fibrillation
Weight: 0.33
, congestive heart failure
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is thrombogenic 1.00
is more thrombogenic 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(valve, is more thrombogenic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mitral valve, is thrombogenic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mitral valve, is thrombogenic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(valve, is more thrombogenic)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mitral valve, is thrombogenic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(valve, is more thrombogenic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(valve, is more thrombogenic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(mitral valve, is thrombogenic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mitral valve, is thrombogenic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mitral valve, is thrombogenic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(mitral valve, is thrombogenic)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(mitral valve, is thrombogenic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mitral valve, is more thrombogenic)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(mitral valve, is thrombogenic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(mitral valve, is more thrombogenic)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mitral valve, is thrombogenic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(mitral valve, is more thrombogenic)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(mitral valve, is thrombogenic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(mitral valve, is more thrombogenic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(mitral valve, is thrombogenic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mitral valve, is thrombogenic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mitral valve, is thrombogenic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mitral valve, is thrombogenic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mitral valve, is thrombogenic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mitral valve, is thrombogenic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(valve, is more thrombogenic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(mitral valve, is thrombogenic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(valve, is more thrombogenic)