mitsubishi: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.63
, giant
Weight: 0.50
, client
Weight: 0.48
Siblings nissan
Weight: 0.36
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.36
, volvo
Weight: 0.36
, chevrolet
Weight: 0.36
, volkswagen
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality worth 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mitsubishi, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chevrolet, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(volkswagen, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(nissan, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(nissan, has quality worth)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(volvo, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mitsubishi, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(nissan, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(nissan, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(volkswagen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(volkswagen, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chevrolet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(chevrolet, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(volvo, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(volvo, has quality worth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(nissan, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(nissan, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(mitsubishi, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(mitsubishi, has quality worth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(mitsubishi, has quality worth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mitsubishi, has quality worth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mitsubishi, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(volvo, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(nissan, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(nissan, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(volkswagen, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(chevrolet, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(mitsubishi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)