mobile phone: were like like past

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cell phone
Weight: 0.86
, telephone system
Weight: 0.74
, digital camera
Weight: 0.73
Siblings smartphone
Weight: 0.70
, android
Weight: 0.63
, headset
Weight: 0.58
, pda
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
were like like past 1.00
get over time 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, were like like past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(android, get over time)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, were like like past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get over time)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mobile phone, were like like past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(smartphone, get over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get over time)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mobile phone, were like like past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(android, get over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(android, get over time)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mobile phone, were like like past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mobile phone, were like like past)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(mobile phone, were like like past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mobile phone, get over time)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(mobile phone, were like like past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mobile phone, get over time)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mobile phone, were like like past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, get over time)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mobile phone, were like like past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, get over time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(mobile phone, were like like past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mobile phone, were like like past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, were like like past)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mobile phone, were like like past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mobile phone, were like like past)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, were like like past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(smartphone, get over time)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, were like like past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(android, get over time)