mode: be best measure of central tendency

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, setting
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arcade
Weight: 0.65
, survival
Weight: 0.62
, default
Weight: 0.61
, cbc
Weight: 0.57
, overlay
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best measure of central tendency 1.00
be best measure of tendency 0.96
measures of central tendency 0.91
measures of tendency 0.85
differ from greatest common factor 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(factor, differ from greatest common factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mode, be best measure of central tendency)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(factor, differ from greatest common factor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(factor, differ from greatest common factor)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(factor, differ from greatest common factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(mode, be best measure of central tendency)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(mode, be best measure of central tendency)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mode, measures of central tendency)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mode, measures of tendency)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(mode, measures of central tendency)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(mode, be best measure of tendency)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(mode, measures of tendency)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(mode, be best measure of tendency)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(mode, be best measure of tendency)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mode, be best measure of tendency)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mode, measures of central tendency)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mode, measures of tendency)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mode, measures of central tendency)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mode, measures of tendency)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mode, be best measure of central tendency)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mode, be best measure of central tendency)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(factor, differ from greatest common factor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(mode, be best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(factor, differ from greatest common factor)