mode: be important in psychology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, setting
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arcade
Weight: 0.65
, survival
Weight: 0.62
, default
Weight: 0.61
, cbc
Weight: 0.57
, overlay
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in psychology 1.00
be important in literature 0.76
be part of theology 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(setting, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mode, be important in psychology)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(concept, be part of theology)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mode, be important in psychology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mode, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(concept, be part of theology)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mode, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(setting, be important in literature)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mode, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(concept, be part of theology)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mode, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(setting, be important in literature)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(setting, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mode, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mode, be important in psychology)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(concept, be part of theology)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mode, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mode, be important in psychology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mode, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(mode, be important in psychology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(mode, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mode, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mode, be important in psychology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mode, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mode, be important in psychology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mode, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(concept, be part of theology)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mode, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(setting, be important in literature)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(mode, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(setting, be important in literature)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(mode, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(concept, be part of theology)