mode: be important in speaking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, setting
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arcade
Weight: 0.65
, survival
Weight: 0.62
, default
Weight: 0.61
, cbc
Weight: 0.57
, overlay
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in speaking 1.00
be important in public speaking 0.94
be important in servicescapes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mode, be important in speaking)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mode, be important in speaking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mode, be important in speaking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(condition, be important in servicescapes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mode, be important in speaking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(mode, be important in speaking)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mode, be important in speaking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(mode, be important in speaking)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mode, be important in speaking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mode, be important in public speaking)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(mode, be important in speaking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(mode, be important in public speaking)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mode, be important in speaking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mode, be important in public speaking)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mode, be important in speaking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(mode, be important in public speaking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(mode, be important in speaking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mode, be important in speaking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mode, be important in speaking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mode, be important in speaking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mode, be important in speaking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mode, be important in speaking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mode, be important in speaking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)