model: change over time

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents example
Weight: 0.65
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings honda civic
Weight: 0.66
, bmw
Weight: 0.64
, theory
Weight: 0.63
, platform
Weight: 0.62
, hybrid
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
change over time 1.00
be change over time 1.00
be changed 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(model, change over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(theory, change over time)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(model, change over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(theory, change over time)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(model, change over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(theory, change over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(theory, change over time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(model, change over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(theory, change over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(theory, change over time)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(model, change over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(model, change over time)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(model, change over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(model, be changed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(model, change over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(model, be changed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(model, change over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(model, be changed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(model, change over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(model, be changed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(model, change over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(model, change over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(model, change over time)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(model, change over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(model, change over time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(model, change over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(theory, change over time)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(model, change over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(theory, change over time)