model: fall on catwalk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents example
Weight: 0.65
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings honda civic
Weight: 0.66
, bmw
Weight: 0.64
, theory
Weight: 0.63
, platform
Weight: 0.62
, hybrid
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
fall on catwalk 1.00
do catwalk 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(model, fall on catwalk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(model, fall on catwalk)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(model, fall on catwalk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(model, do catwalk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(model, fall on catwalk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(model, do catwalk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(model, fall on catwalk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(model, do catwalk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(model, fall on catwalk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(model, do catwalk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(model, fall on catwalk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(model, fall on catwalk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(model, fall on catwalk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(model, fall on catwalk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(model, fall on catwalk)