model: have eat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents example
Weight: 0.65
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings honda civic
Weight: 0.66
, bmw
Weight: 0.64
, theory
Weight: 0.63
, platform
Weight: 0.62
, hybrid
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
have eat 1.00
eat 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(model, have eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(model, have eat)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(model, have eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(model, eat)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(model, have eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(model, eat)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(model, have eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(model, eat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(model, have eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(model, eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(model, have eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(model, have eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(model, have eat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(model, have eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(model, have eat)