modeling: be important in field of computer science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.65
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, part
Weight: 0.57
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
, strategy
Weight: 0.56
Siblings mapping
Weight: 0.34
, free software
Weight: 0.32
, calculator
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in field of computer science 1.00
be in science 0.88
be important in field 0.84
be in classroom 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(modeling, be important in field of computer science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(modeling, be important in field of computer science)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(modeling, be important in field of computer science)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(modeling, be in science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(modeling, be important in field of computer science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(modeling, be in science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(modeling, be important in field of computer science)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(modeling, be in classroom)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(modeling, be important in field of computer science)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(modeling, be important in field)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(modeling, be important in field of computer science)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(modeling, be in science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(modeling, be important in field of computer science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(modeling, be in classroom)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(modeling, be important in field of computer science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(modeling, be important in field)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(modeling, be important in field of computer science)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(modeling, be in classroom)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(modeling, be important in field of computer science)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(modeling, be important in field)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(modeling, be important in field of computer science)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(modeling, be important in field)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(modeling, be important in field of computer science)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(modeling, be in classroom)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(modeling, be important in field of computer science)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(modeling, be in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(modeling, be important in field of computer science)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(modeling, be important in field of computer science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(modeling, be important in field of computer science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(modeling, be important in field of computer science)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(modeling, be important in field of computer science)