modeling: has physical part process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.65
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, part
Weight: 0.57
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
, strategy
Weight: 0.56
Siblings mapping
Weight: 0.34
, free software
Weight: 0.32
, calculator
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part process 1.00
be in one part 0.76
enhance systems engineering process 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(part, be in one part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(modeling, has physical part process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(modeling, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(part, be in one part)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(modeling, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(part, be in one part)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(part, be in one part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(modeling, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(modeling, has physical part process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(modeling, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(modeling, has physical part process)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(modeling, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(modeling, enhance systems engineering process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(modeling, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(modeling, enhance systems engineering process)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(modeling, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(modeling, enhance systems engineering process)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(modeling, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(modeling, enhance systems engineering process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(modeling, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(modeling, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(modeling, has physical part process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(modeling, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(modeling, has physical part process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(modeling, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(part, be in one part)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(modeling, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(part, be in one part)