modern: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents format
Weight: 0.53
, label
Weight: 0.52
, style
Weight: 0.51
, book
Weight: 0.51
Siblings modern dance
Weight: 0.34
, baroque
Weight: 0.32
, gothic
Weight: 0.31
, classical
Weight: 0.31
, realism
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality wrong 0.87
be bad 0.86
has quality worth 0.82
is bad thing 0.79
is terrible 0.77
is music bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(book, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(modern, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(label, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(modern, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(modern, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(style, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(modern, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(book, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(modern, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(style, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(modern, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(style, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(style, is bad thing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(style, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(label, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(book, has quality better)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(book, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(label, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(book, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(book, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(style, is bad thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(baroque, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(realism, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(style, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(modern, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(book, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(modern, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(label, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(modern, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(modern, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(book, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(modern, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(style, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(modern, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(baroque, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(baroque, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(realism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(realism, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(modern, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(modern, has quality wrong)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality wrong)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(modern, has quality wrong)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(modern, is music bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(modern, is music bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, is music bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(modern, is music bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(modern, has quality wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(modern, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(label, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(book, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(book, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(style, is bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(baroque, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(realism, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(style, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(label, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(book, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(modern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(book, has quality good)