modification: be in netherlands

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents revision
Weight: 0.67
, provision
Weight: 0.64
, document
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.59
Siblings correction
Weight: 0.64
, structure
Weight: 0.63
, adaptation
Weight: 0.59
, deletion
Weight: 0.59
, linkage
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in netherlands 1.00
be in netherlands considered 0.96
be in germany 0.79
were in germany 0.78
were in germany bad 0.77
were in japan different from conditions in germany 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(modification, be in netherlands)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(modification, be in netherlands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(modification, be in netherlands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(modification, be in netherlands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(modification, be in netherlands)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(modification, be in netherlands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(modification, be in netherlands)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(modification, be in netherlands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(modification, be in netherlands considered)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(modification, be in netherlands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(modification, be in netherlands considered)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(modification, be in netherlands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(modification, be in netherlands considered)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(modification, be in netherlands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(modification, be in netherlands considered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(modification, be in netherlands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(modification, be in netherlands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(modification, be in netherlands)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(modification, be in netherlands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(modification, be in netherlands)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(modification, be in netherlands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(modification, be in netherlands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)