mold: be attracted to bread

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.66
, fungus
Weight: 0.61
, substance
Weight: 0.61
, hazard
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mildew
Weight: 0.34
, yeast
Weight: 0.33
, asbestos
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be attracted to bread 1.00
get on bread 0.88
affect bread 0.87
grow bread on wheat bread 0.85
grow on bakery white bread 0.82
grow faster than sourdough bread 0.81
grow on bakery bread 0.81
grow on aged bread 0.81
grow on slices of bread 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mold, be attracted to bread)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(yeast, affect bread)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mold, be attracted to bread)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(yeast, affect bread)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(yeast, affect bread)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mold, be attracted to bread)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(mold, be attracted to bread)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mold, be attracted to bread)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(mold, affect bread)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mold, be attracted to bread)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mold, get on bread)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(mold, be attracted to bread)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(mold, affect bread)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(mold, be attracted to bread)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(mold, get on bread)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mold, be attracted to bread)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(mold, affect bread)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mold, be attracted to bread)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(mold, get on bread)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(mold, be attracted to bread)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mold, affect bread)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(mold, be attracted to bread)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(mold, get on bread)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(mold, be attracted to bread)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(mold, be attracted to bread)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mold, be attracted to bread)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mold, be attracted to bread)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(mold, be attracted to bread)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mold, be attracted to bread)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(yeast, affect bread)