mold: be dangerous on food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.66
, fungus
Weight: 0.61
, substance
Weight: 0.61
, hazard
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings aspergillus
Weight: 0.65
, mildew
Weight: 0.34
, yeast
Weight: 0.33
, asbestos
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous on food 1.00
be on food 0.89
get on food 0.87
affect food 0.83
show up on food 0.79
is unhealthy 0.76
be important to food industry 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mildew, is unhealthy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(mildew, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(mildew, is unhealthy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(mold, be dangerous on food)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(mold, be on food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mold, be on food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mold, be on food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mold, affect food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(mold, get on food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mold, get on food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mold, get on food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(mold, get on food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(mold, affect food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mold, show up on food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mold, be on food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(mold, affect food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(mold, show up on food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mold, show up on food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mold, show up on food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mold, affect food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mold, is unhealthy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mold, is unhealthy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mold, is unhealthy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mold, is unhealthy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mold, be dangerous on food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mold, be dangerous on food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mold, be dangerous on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mildew, is unhealthy)