mole: has physical part nose

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.67
, mammal
Weight: 0.63
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, sauce
Weight: 0.58
, animal
Weight: 0.57
Siblings kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.34
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.34
, lizard
Weight: 0.34
, petri dish
Weight: 0.34
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part nose 1.00
has physical part eyes 0.86
have star noses 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mole, has physical part nose)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(mole, has physical part nose)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(mole, has physical part nose)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mole, have star noses)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(mole, have star noses)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(mole, have star noses)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(mole, has physical part eyes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mole, has physical part eyes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mole, has physical part eyes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mole, has physical part eyes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(mole, have star noses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mole, has physical part nose)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mole, has physical part nose)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(mole, has physical part nose) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)