mom: be obsessed with sons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sister
Weight: 0.72
, dad
Weight: 0.68
, mother
Weight: 0.68
, grandmother
Weight: 0.67
Siblings grandma
Weight: 0.66
, daphne
Weight: 0.41
, aunt
Weight: 0.37
, father
Weight: 0.37
, young girl
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be obsessed with sons 1.00
love much sons 0.92
prefer sons 0.89
get jealous of daughters 0.87
hate daughters 0.87
favor sons 0.87
be overprotective of sons 0.87
protect sons 0.87
spoil sons 0.85
be protective of sons 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(dad, prefer sons)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mom, be obsessed with sons)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mother, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mom, be obsessed with sons)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mother, be obsessed with sons)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(dad, prefer sons)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mother, be obsessed with sons)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dad, prefer sons)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(father, prefer sons)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mother, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mom, be obsessed with sons)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(dad, prefer sons)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mom, be obsessed with sons)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(father, prefer sons)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(father, prefer sons)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(mom, be obsessed with sons)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(mom, be overprotective of sons)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(mom, be overprotective of sons)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(mom, be overprotective of sons)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(mom, be protective of sons)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mom, be protective of sons)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mom, be obsessed with sons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mom, be obsessed with sons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mother, be obsessed with sons)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dad, prefer sons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(father, prefer sons)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mother, be obsessed with sons)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(mom, be obsessed with sons)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dad, prefer sons)