money: have value

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motivation
Weight: 0.65
, money laundering
Weight: 0.65
, stuff
Weight: 0.64
, method
Weight: 0.61
Siblings dollar bill
Weight: 0.63
, cash register
Weight: 0.60
, penny
Weight: 0.59
, hire
Weight: 0.49
, ssi
Weight: 0.46

Related properties

Property Similarity
have value 1.00
has value 0.98
is value 0.98
get value 0.97
have time value 0.96
even have value 0.96
hold value 0.90
lose value 0.89
something of value 0.89
hold same value 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(money, have value)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(dollar bill, is value)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(money, have value)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(dollar bill, is value)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dollar bill, is value)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(money, have value)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(money, have value)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(money, have value)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(money, has value)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(money, have value)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(money, lose value)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(money, have value)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(money, has value)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(money, have value)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(money, lose value)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(money, have value)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(money, lose value)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(money, have value)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(money, has value)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(money, have value)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(money, has value)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(money, have value)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(money, lose value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(money, have value)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(money, have value)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(money, have value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(money, have value)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(money, have value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(money, have value)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(dollar bill, is value)