money: is worth more

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motivation
Weight: 0.65
, money laundering
Weight: 0.65
, stuff
Weight: 0.64
, method
Weight: 0.61
Siblings dollar bill
Weight: 0.63
, cash register
Weight: 0.60
, penny
Weight: 0.59
, hire
Weight: 0.49
, ssi
Weight: 0.46

Related properties

Property Similarity
is worth more 1.00
be worth less today 0.95
be worth over less time 0.94
is worth more in past 0.93
be worth today 0.93
be worth over time 0.92
be worth in less future 0.91
is worth something 0.90
is worth anything 0.88
be worth in future 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(money, is worth more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(dollar bill, is worth anything)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(money, is worth more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(dollar bill, is worth anything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(dollar bill, is worth anything)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(money, is worth more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(money, is worth more)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(money, is worth more) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(money, is worth something)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(money, is worth more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(money, is worth anything)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(money, is worth more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(money, is worth something)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(money, is worth more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(money, is worth anything)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(money, is worth more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(money, is worth something)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(money, is worth more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(money, is worth anything)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(money, is worth more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(money, is worth something)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(money, is worth more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(money, is worth anything)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(money, is worth more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(money, is worth more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(money, is worth more)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(money, is worth more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(money, is worth more)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(money, is worth more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dollar bill, is worth anything)