monk: be important in buddhism

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.61
, character
Weight: 0.60
, religious leader
Weight: 0.59
, scholar
Weight: 0.58
, television show
Weight: 0.57
Siblings dalai lama
Weight: 0.66
, priest
Weight: 0.36
, judas priest
Weight: 0.35
, pope
Weight: 0.34
, buddha
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in buddhism 1.00
be supported in buddhism 0.83
be important to christians 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(monk, be important in buddhism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(buddha, be important in buddhism)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(monk, be important in buddhism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(buddha, be important in buddhism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(buddha, be important in buddhism)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(monk, be important in buddhism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(monk, be important in buddhism)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(monk, be important in buddhism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(monk, be supported in buddhism)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(monk, be important in buddhism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(monk, be supported in buddhism)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(monk, be important in buddhism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(monk, be important to christians)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(monk, be important in buddhism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(monk, be supported in buddhism)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(monk, be important in buddhism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(monk, be important to christians)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(monk, be important in buddhism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(monk, be important to christians)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(monk, be important in buddhism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(monk, be supported in buddhism)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(monk, be important in buddhism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(monk, be important to christians)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(monk, be important in buddhism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(monk, be important in buddhism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(monk, be important in buddhism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(monk, be important in buddhism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(monk, be important in buddhism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(monk, be important in buddhism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(buddha, be important in buddhism)