monk: were important in middle ages

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.61
, character
Weight: 0.60
, religious leader
Weight: 0.59
, scholar
Weight: 0.58
, television show
Weight: 0.57
Siblings dalai lama
Weight: 0.66
, priest
Weight: 0.36
, judas priest
Weight: 0.35
, pope
Weight: 0.34
, buddha
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were important in middle ages 1.00
were frustrated in early middle ages 0.90
were wealthy in medieval ages 0.83
be least played class 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(monk, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(monk, were important in middle ages)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(monk, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(monk, were frustrated in early middle ages)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(monk, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(monk, were frustrated in early middle ages)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(monk, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(monk, were wealthy in medieval ages)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(monk, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(monk, were frustrated in early middle ages)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(monk, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(monk, were wealthy in medieval ages)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(monk, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(monk, be least played class)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(monk, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(monk, be least played class)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(monk, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(monk, be least played class)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(monk, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(monk, be least played class)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(monk, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(monk, were wealthy in medieval ages)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(monk, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(monk, were frustrated in early middle ages)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(monk, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(monk, were wealthy in medieval ages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(monk, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(monk, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(monk, were important in middle ages)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(monk, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(monk, were important in middle ages)