monkey: be at television advertisement

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.75
, wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.72
, primate
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.70
Siblings spider monkey
Weight: 0.71
, ape
Weight: 0.61
, mandrill
Weight: 0.54
, marmoset
Weight: 0.52
, lemur
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at television advertisement 1.00
be at television ad 0.93
be at public television documentary 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at television advertisement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at public television documentary)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(monkey, be at television advertisement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lemur, be at public television documentary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at public television documentary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(monkey, be at television advertisement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(monkey, be at television advertisement)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(monkey, be at television advertisement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at television ad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(monkey, be at television advertisement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(monkey, be at television ad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(monkey, be at television advertisement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(monkey, be at television ad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(monkey, be at television advertisement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at television ad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(monkey, be at television advertisement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(monkey, be at television advertisement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at television advertisement)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(monkey, be at television advertisement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(monkey, be at television advertisement)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at television advertisement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(lemur, be at public television documentary)