monkey: be like humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.75
, wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.72
, primate
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.70
Siblings baboon
Weight: 0.77
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.71
, ape
Weight: 0.61
, red panda
Weight: 0.60
, mandrill
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be like humans 1.00
eat other monkeys 0.80
comunicate with other monkeys 0.79
interact with other monkeys 0.79
eat monkeys 0.78
be called animals 0.77
interact with monkeys 0.77
get along with other monkeys 0.77
be called arctic monkeys 0.77
steal other monkeys babies 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ape, eat monkeys)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ape, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ape, be like humans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(ape, eat monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ape, eat monkeys)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(monkey, be like humans)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(monkey, eat monkeys)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(monkey, eat monkeys)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(monkey, eat monkeys)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(monkey, eat monkeys)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be like humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(monkey, be like humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ape, be like humans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(ape, eat monkeys)