monogamy: be difficult for humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.54
, factor
Weight: 0.52
, principle
Weight: 0.51
, topic
Weight: 0.50
Siblings homosexual
Weight: 0.33
, female circumcision
Weight: 0.33
, infidelity
Weight: 0.33
, lust
Weight: 0.33
, kissing
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be difficult for humans 1.00
is difficult 0.87
be rare in mammals 0.77
more is common than than mammals 0.77
be rare in animals 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(issue, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(monogamy, be difficult for humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(issue, is difficult)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, is difficult)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(issue, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(monogamy, be difficult for humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(monogamy, be difficult for humans)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(monogamy, is difficult)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(monogamy, is difficult)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, is difficult)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(monogamy, more is common than than mammals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(monogamy, is difficult)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(monogamy, be rare in animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(monogamy, be rare in animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, be rare in animals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(monogamy, more is common than than mammals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(monogamy, be rare in mammals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(monogamy, be rare in animals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(monogamy, be rare in mammals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(monogamy, be rare in mammals)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(monogamy, more is common than than mammals)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, be rare in mammals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, more is common than than mammals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, be difficult for humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(monogamy, be difficult for humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(issue, is difficult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(monogamy, be difficult for humans)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(issue, is difficult)