monogamy: be popular common

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.54
, factor
Weight: 0.52
, principle
Weight: 0.51
, topic
Weight: 0.50
Siblings homosexual
Weight: 0.33
, female circumcision
Weight: 0.33
, infidelity
Weight: 0.33
, lust
Weight: 0.33
, kissing
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular common 1.00
is popular 0.87
be common in birds 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, be popular common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(kissing, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(monogamy, be popular common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(kissing, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(kissing, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(monogamy, be popular common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(monogamy, be popular common)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(monogamy, be popular common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(monogamy, is popular)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(monogamy, be popular common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(monogamy, is popular)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(monogamy, be popular common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(monogamy, be common in birds)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(monogamy, be popular common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(monogamy, be common in birds)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(monogamy, be popular common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(monogamy, is popular)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(monogamy, be popular common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(monogamy, be common in birds)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(monogamy, be popular common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, is popular)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(monogamy, be popular common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, be common in birds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(monogamy, be popular common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(monogamy, be popular common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, be popular common)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(monogamy, be popular common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(monogamy, be popular common)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, be popular common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(kissing, is popular)