monogamy: is big

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.54
, factor
Weight: 0.52
, principle
Weight: 0.51
, topic
Weight: 0.50
Siblings homosexual
Weight: 0.33
, female circumcision
Weight: 0.33
, infidelity
Weight: 0.33
, lust
Weight: 0.33
, kissing
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is big 1.00
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is big)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lust, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(monogamy, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(infidelity, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(infidelity, is big)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(monogamy, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(lust, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(lust, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(monogamy, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(monogamy, is big)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(monogamy, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(monogamy, is good thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(monogamy, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(monogamy, is good thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(monogamy, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(monogamy, is good thing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monogamy, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, is good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(monogamy, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(monogamy, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, is big)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(monogamy, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(monogamy, is big)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(infidelity, is big)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monogamy, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lust, is good thing)