monopoly: be illegal in us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board game
Weight: 0.62
, combination
Weight: 0.56
, word
Weight: 0.56
, title
Weight: 0.54
, game
Weight: 0.54
Siblings capitalism
Weight: 0.31
, taboo
Weight: 0.31
, mafia
Weight: 0.31
, dominion
Weight: 0.30
, silence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in us 1.00
is illegal 0.90
be illegal today 0.89
be illegal in country 0.89
be illegal in modern america 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(title, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(monopoly, be illegal in us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(monopoly, be illegal in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(title, is illegal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be illegal in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(title, is illegal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(title, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(monopoly, be illegal in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be illegal in us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(monopoly, be illegal in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(monopoly, be illegal in us)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(monopoly, be illegal in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(monopoly, is illegal)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(monopoly, be illegal in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be illegal in country)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(monopoly, be illegal in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be illegal in country)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(monopoly, be illegal in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(monopoly, be illegal in country)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(monopoly, be illegal in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be illegal today)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(monopoly, be illegal in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(monopoly, be illegal in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be illegal in us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(monopoly, be illegal in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(monopoly, be illegal in us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be illegal in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(title, is illegal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(monopoly, be illegal in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(title, is illegal)