montana: has color white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, area
Weight: 0.57
, state
Weight: 0.54
, united states
Weight: 0.53
, colorado
Weight: 0.53
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.34
, wyoming
Weight: 0.34
, delaware
Weight: 0.34
, north carolina
Weight: 0.34
, idaho
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color white 1.00
has color red 0.93
has color yellow 0.93
is red state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(state, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(montana, has color white)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(colorado, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(montana, has color white)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(colorado, has color red)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(state, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(colorado, has color red)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(state, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is red state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(idaho, has color red)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(state, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(montana, has color white)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(colorado, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(montana, has color white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(idaho, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(idaho, has color red)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(idaho, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(idaho, is red state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(montana, has color white)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(montana, has color yellow)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(montana, has color red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(montana, has color yellow)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(montana, has color red)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(montana, is red state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(montana, has color yellow)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(montana, has color red)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(montana, has color red)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(montana, has color yellow)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(montana, is red state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(montana, is red state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(montana, is red state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(montana, has color white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(montana, has color white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(colorado, has color red)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(state, has color red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(idaho, has color red)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(idaho, is red state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(colorado, has color red)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(montana, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(state, has color red)