montana: have casinos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, area
Weight: 0.57
, state
Weight: 0.54
, united states
Weight: 0.53
, colorado
Weight: 0.53
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.34
, wyoming
Weight: 0.34
, delaware
Weight: 0.34
, north carolina
Weight: 0.34
, idaho
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have casinos 1.00
have many casinos 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(montana, have casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(montana, have casinos)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(montana, have casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(montana, have many casinos)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(montana, have casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(montana, have many casinos)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(montana, have casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(montana, have many casinos)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(montana, have casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(montana, have many casinos)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(montana, have casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(montana, have casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(montana, have casinos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(montana, have casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(montana, have casinos)