montreal: be covered in spiders

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.57
, quebec
Weight: 0.57
Siblings ottawa
Weight: 0.53
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, toronto
Weight: 0.36
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, las vegas
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be covered in spiders 1.00
have spiders 0.92
have many spiders 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(montreal, be covered in spiders)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(montreal, be covered in spiders)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(montreal, be covered in spiders)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(montreal, have spiders)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(montreal, be covered in spiders)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(montreal, have spiders)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(montreal, be covered in spiders)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(montreal, have spiders)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(montreal, be covered in spiders)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(montreal, have many spiders)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(montreal, be covered in spiders)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(montreal, have many spiders)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(montreal, be covered in spiders)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(montreal, have many spiders)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(montreal, be covered in spiders)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(montreal, have spiders)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(montreal, be covered in spiders)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(montreal, have many spiders)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(montreal, be covered in spiders)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(montreal, be covered in spiders)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be covered in spiders)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(montreal, be covered in spiders)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(montreal, be covered in spiders)