montreal: is great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.57
, quebec
Weight: 0.57
Siblings ottawa
Weight: 0.53
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, toronto
Weight: 0.36
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, las vegas
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great 1.00
is great city 0.87
has quality good 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new york, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(montreal, is great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(new york, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(new york, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(toronto, is great)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toronto, is great city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new york, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(montreal, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(toronto, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(toronto, is great)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(toronto, is great city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(toronto, is great city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(montreal, is great)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(montreal, is great city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(montreal, is great city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(montreal, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(montreal, is great city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(montreal, is great city)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(montreal, is great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(montreal, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new york, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(toronto, is great)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(toronto, is great city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(montreal, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new york, is great)