moor: is national park

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.44
, land
Weight: 0.42
, term
Weight: 0.40
, area
Weight: 0.35
, word
Weight: 0.34
Siblings marina
Weight: 0.30
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.30
, anchorage
Weight: 0.30
, park
Weight: 0.30
, pub
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is national park 1.00
is park 0.90
is national 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(park, is national park)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(park, is national)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(park, is national park)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(park, is national park)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(park, is national)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(park, is national)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(moor, is national park)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(moor, is park)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(moor, is park)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(moor, is park)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(moor, is national)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(moor, is national)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(moor, is national)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(moor, is park)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(moor, is national)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(moor, is national park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(moor, is national park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is national park)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(moor, is national park)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is national)