more: be important wark

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents information
Weight: 0.61
, person
Weight: 0.59
, way
Weight: 0.57
, organization
Weight: 0.56
, food
Weight: 0.51
Siblings one person
Weight: 0.33
, lot
Weight: 0.32
, young people
Weight: 0.32
, anyone
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important wark 1.00
be important hard wark 0.87
be essential 0.84
is important than how 0.82
be vital than control 0.80
is useful 0.79
be valuable than money 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(more, be important wark)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(more, be important hard wark)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(more, be important hard wark)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(more, be essential)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(more, be essential)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(more, be important hard wark)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(more, is important than how)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(more, be essential)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(more, is important than how)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(more, be vital than control)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(more, be vital than control)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(more, is important than how)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(more, is useful)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(more, is useful)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(more, be vital than control)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(more, is useful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(more, be valuable than money)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(more, be valuable than money)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(more, be valuable than money)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(more, be important hard wark)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(more, be essential)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(more, is important than how)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(more, be vital than control)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(more, is useful)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(more, be valuable than money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(more, be important wark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(more, be important wark)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(more, be important wark)