mosquito bite: be bad year

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.69
, mosquito
Weight: 0.60
, bite
Weight: 0.56
, reaction
Weight: 0.49
, allergy
Weight: 0.45
Siblings aphid
Weight: 0.36
, housefly
Weight: 0.36
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.36
, termite
Weight: 0.36
, sandfly
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad year 1.00
be worse year 0.88
has quality bad 0.79
be worse at night 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(allergy, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mosquito bite, be bad year)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(allergy, be worse at night)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mosquito bite, be bad year)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(allergy, be bad year)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(allergy, be worse at night)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(allergy, be bad year)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(allergy, be worse at night)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(aphid, be bad year)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(aphid, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(allergy, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mosquito bite, be bad year)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(allergy, be worse at night)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mosquito bite, be bad year)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(aphid, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(aphid, be bad year)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(aphid, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(aphid, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(mosquito bite, be bad year)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mosquito bite, be worse year)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(mosquito bite, be worse year)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mosquito bite, be worse year)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mosquito bite, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mosquito bite, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mosquito bite, be worse at night)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(mosquito bite, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mosquito bite, be worse year)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(mosquito bite, be worse at night)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mosquito bite, be worse at night)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mosquito bite, be worse at night)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mosquito bite, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mosquito bite, be bad year)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mosquito bite, be bad year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(allergy, be bad year)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(allergy, be worse at night)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(aphid, be bad year)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(aphid, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(allergy, be bad year)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(mosquito bite, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(allergy, be worse at night)