most cars: is rear wheel drive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
is rear wheel drive 1.00
is front wheel drive 0.95
is wheel drive 0.94
is wheel arches 0.82
is wheel arches curved 0.80
is wheel arches curved inwards 0.79
is front engine 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(most cars, is rear wheel drive)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(most cars, is front wheel drive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(most cars, is front wheel drive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(most cars, is front wheel drive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(most cars, is wheel arches curved inwards)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(most cars, is front wheel drive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(most cars, is wheel arches curved inwards)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(most cars, is wheel drive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(most cars, is wheel drive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(most cars, is wheel drive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(most cars, is wheel arches curved inwards)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(most cars, is wheel arches curved inwards)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(most cars, is wheel arches)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(most cars, is wheel drive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(most cars, is wheel arches)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(most cars, is wheel arches curved)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(most cars, is wheel arches curved)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(most cars, is wheel arches)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(most cars, is front engine)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(most cars, is wheel arches curved)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(most cars, is wheel arches)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(most cars, is front engine)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(most cars, is wheel arches curved)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(most cars, is front engine)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(most cars, is front engine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(most cars, is rear wheel drive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(most cars, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(most cars, is rear wheel drive)