motion: be related terms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, characteristic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings image
Weight: 0.61
, pitch
Weight: 0.60
, action
Weight: 0.60
, running
Weight: 0.57
, yaw
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related terms 1.00
be related 0.85
is related 0.84
be relative terms 0.84
is relative terms 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(characteristic, be related)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(motion, be related terms)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(motion, be related terms)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factor, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(characteristic, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, be related)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pitch, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pitch, is related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(characteristic, be related)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(motion, be related terms)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(motion, be related terms)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pitch, is related)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pitch, is related)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(pitch, be related)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pitch, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(motion, be related terms)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(motion, be related)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(motion, is related)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(motion, is relative terms)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(motion, be relative terms)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(motion, be relative terms)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(motion, be related)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(motion, is relative terms)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(motion, is related)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(motion, be relative terms)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(motion, be relative terms)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(motion, is relative terms)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(motion, be related)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(motion, is relative terms)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(motion, is related)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(motion, be related)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(motion, is related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(motion, be related terms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(motion, be related terms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(characteristic, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pitch, be related)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pitch, is related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(motion, be related terms)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(characteristic, be related)