:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(motorway, yamaha)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(highway, xm)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(motorway, yamaha)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(highway, is xm)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(motorway, yamaha)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(highway, xm)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(highway, xm)
Salient implies Plausible
0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(motorway, yamaha)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(motorway, yamaha)
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(motorway, yamaha)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(motorway, yamaha)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(motorway, yamaha)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(highway, xm)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(motorway, yamaha)
⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(highway, is xm)