mountain dew: is damn popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.69
, drink
Weight: 0.66
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.61
, soda
Weight: 0.59
Siblings drinking water
Weight: 0.34
, coca cola
Weight: 0.33
, bottled water
Weight: 0.33
, alpine
Weight: 0.33
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is damn popular 1.00
is popular 0.82
be popular in appalachia 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(drink, is popular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mountain dew, is damn popular)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(soft drink, is popular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mountain dew, is damn popular)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(brand, is popular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mountain dew, is damn popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(brand, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(soft drink, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(drink, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is popular)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(drink, is popular)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(brand, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(drink, is popular)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mountain dew, is damn popular)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(soft drink, is popular)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mountain dew, is damn popular)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(brand, is popular)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mountain dew, is damn popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(coca cola, is popular)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(coca cola, is popular)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(bottled water, is popular)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(mountain dew, is damn popular)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(mountain dew, be popular in appalachia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(mountain dew, be popular in appalachia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mountain dew, is popular)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(mountain dew, be popular in appalachia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be popular in appalachia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mountain dew, is popular)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mountain dew, is popular)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, is damn popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mountain dew, is damn popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brand, is popular)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soft drink, is popular)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(drink, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(coca cola, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bottled water, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brand, is popular)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soft drink, is popular)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mountain dew, is damn popular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(drink, is popular)