mountain: be covered in snow

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents elevation
Weight: 0.63
, obstacle
Weight: 0.62
, sight
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
, city
Weight: 0.59
Siblings mountain range
Weight: 0.37
, hill
Weight: 0.35
, waterfall
Weight: 0.34
, boulder
Weight: 0.34
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be covered in snow 1.00
be covered with snow 1.00
have snow 0.92
is snow 0.92
is rwenzori snow 0.92
get snow 0.92
have covered in snow peaks 0.91
get more snow 0.91
have snow on top 0.89
is snow land 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(elevation, get more snow)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mountain, be covered in snow)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(elevation, get snow)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mountain, be covered in snow)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(elevation, get snow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(elevation, get more snow)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(elevation, get snow)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(elevation, get more snow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(elevation, get snow)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mountain, be covered in snow)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(elevation, get more snow)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mountain, be covered in snow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(mountain, be covered in snow)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mountain, be covered with snow)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be covered with snow)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(mountain, is snow)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mountain, is snow)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mountain, have snow)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(mountain, is snow)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mountain, be covered with snow)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mountain, get snow)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(mountain, have snow)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mountain, be covered with snow)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(mountain, get snow)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mountain, have snow)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mountain, have snow on top)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(mountain, have snow on top)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(mountain, is snow)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mountain, have snow)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(mountain, get snow)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mountain, have snow on top)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mountain, get snow)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mountain, have snow on top)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be covered in snow)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mountain, be covered in snow)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(elevation, get snow)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(elevation, get more snow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(elevation, get snow)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mountain, be covered in snow)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(elevation, get more snow)