mountain: be nice to visit

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.62
, sight
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
, city
Weight: 0.59
, earth
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hill
Weight: 0.35
, waterfall
Weight: 0.34
, boulder
Weight: 0.34
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.33
, lava
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be nice to visit 1.00
trip person 0.76
be beautiful to look at 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(obstacle, trip person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mountain, be nice to visit)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mountain, be nice to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(obstacle, trip person)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be nice to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(obstacle, trip person)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(obstacle, trip person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(mountain, be nice to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mountain, be nice to visit)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mountain, be nice to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(mountain, be nice to visit)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(mountain, be nice to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(mountain, be beautiful to look at)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(mountain, be nice to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be beautiful to look at)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mountain, be nice to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mountain, be beautiful to look at)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(mountain, be nice to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mountain, be beautiful to look at)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(mountain, be nice to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mountain, be nice to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be nice to visit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mountain, be nice to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mountain, be nice to visit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be nice to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(obstacle, trip person)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(mountain, be nice to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(obstacle, trip person)