mountain: be useful to people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents elevation
Weight: 0.63
, obstacle
Weight: 0.62
, sight
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
, city
Weight: 0.59
Siblings mountain range
Weight: 0.37
, hill
Weight: 0.35
, waterfall
Weight: 0.34
, boulder
Weight: 0.34
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful to people 1.00
be useful to man 0.87
be important to people 0.87
be useful in agriculture 0.78
affect people 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hill, affect people)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(waterfall, affect people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(waterfall, affect people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(waterfall, affect people)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(hill, affect people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hill, affect people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(mountain, be useful to people)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mountain, be useful to man)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mountain, be important to people)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(mountain, be useful in agriculture)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mountain, be useful in agriculture)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mountain, be useful in agriculture)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(mountain, be useful to man)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mountain, be useful to man)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be useful in agriculture)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mountain, be important to people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mountain, affect people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mountain, be important to people)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be useful to man)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(mountain, affect people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(mountain, affect people)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be important to people)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mountain, affect people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be useful to people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mountain, be useful to people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(waterfall, affect people)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hill, affect people)