mountain: hinder people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents elevation
Weight: 0.63
, obstacle
Weight: 0.62
, sight
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
, city
Weight: 0.59
Siblings mountain range
Weight: 0.37
, hill
Weight: 0.35
, waterfall
Weight: 0.34
, boulder
Weight: 0.34
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
hinder people 1.00
affect people 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mountain, hinder people)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hill, affect people)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mountain, hinder people)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(waterfall, affect people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mountain, hinder people)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(waterfall, affect people)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(waterfall, affect people)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mountain, hinder people)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(hill, affect people)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hill, affect people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mountain, hinder people)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(mountain, hinder people)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mountain, hinder people)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mountain, affect people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mountain, hinder people)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(mountain, affect people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mountain, hinder people)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(mountain, affect people)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mountain, hinder people)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mountain, affect people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mountain, hinder people)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mountain, hinder people)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mountain, hinder people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mountain, hinder people)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mountain, hinder people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mountain, hinder people)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(waterfall, affect people)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mountain, hinder people)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hill, affect people)