mountain: is cold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents elevation
Weight: 0.63
, obstacle
Weight: 0.62
, sight
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
, city
Weight: 0.59
Siblings mountain range
Weight: 0.37
, hill
Weight: 0.35
, waterfall
Weight: 0.34
, boulder
Weight: 0.34
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cold 1.00
be cold at top 0.85
be cold heat rises 0.83
be colder at top 0.76
have wet side 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(waterfall, is cold)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(waterfall, is cold)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(waterfall, is cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(mountain, is cold)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(mountain, be cold at top)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be cold at top)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(mountain, be cold at top)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mountain, be cold at top)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mountain, be colder at top)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(mountain, be colder at top)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be colder at top)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(mountain, be cold heat rises)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mountain, be colder at top)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mountain, be cold heat rises)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be cold heat rises)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(mountain, be cold heat rises)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mountain, is cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mountain, is cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mountain, is cold)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(waterfall, is cold)