mountain: rise up above landscape

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.62
, sight
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
, city
Weight: 0.59
, earth
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hill
Weight: 0.35
, waterfall
Weight: 0.34
, boulder
Weight: 0.34
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.33
, lava
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
rise up above landscape 1.00
be at landscape 0.82
be used to climb up it 0.79
be used to climb up 0.79
be reflect in lake below 0.78
be drop up 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(object, be drop up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mountain, rise up above landscape)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(object, be drop up)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(object, be drop up)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hill, be at landscape)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hill, be used to climb up it)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hill, be used to climb up)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(object, be drop up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mountain, rise up above landscape)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(hill, be used to climb up it) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hill, be used to climb up it)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hill, be at landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hill, be at landscape)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hill, be used to climb up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hill, be used to climb up)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mountain, rise up above landscape)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mountain, be reflect in lake below)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be reflect in lake below)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mountain, be reflect in lake below)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mountain, be reflect in lake below)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mountain, rise up above landscape)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mountain, rise up above landscape)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(object, be drop up)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hill, be at landscape)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hill, be used to climb up it)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hill, be used to climb up)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mountain, rise up above landscape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(object, be drop up)