mouse: be at new york

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.63
, organism
Weight: 0.61
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, antibody
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer mouse
Weight: 0.68
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.35
, cat
Weight: 0.35
, rat
Weight: 0.34
, lizard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at new york 1.00
be at new york city 0.97
be at new hampshire 0.79
be at new mexico 0.79
be at london 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at new mexico)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mouse, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(lizard, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at new mexico)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mouse, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(mouse, be at new york)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mouse, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(mouse, be at london)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(mouse, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(mouse, be at london)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mouse, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mouse, be at london)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mouse, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at london)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(mouse, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mouse, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mouse, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mouse, be at new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lizard, be at new mexico)